Miami Child Pornography Attorneys

Some of these consequences can include:

• Residency restrictions. Registered sex offenders are prohibited from living within a certain distance of schools, parks, playgrounds, and other places where children congregate. These limitations can make finding suitable housing challenging and can force individuals to live in specific, often less desirable areas.
• Employment limitations. Many employers are reluctant to hire individuals listed on the sex offender registry, which can severely limit job opportunities. Additionally, certain professions, especially those involving contact with children or vulnerable populations, are typically off-limits.
• Ongoing public disclosure. The status of a registered sex offender is publicly accessible, which can impact both personal and professional relationships. Neighbors, colleagues, and community members can easily access this information.
• Travel restrictions. Traveling can be complicated for registered sex offenders. Before traveling out of state, Florida sex offenders are required to report in person to the local sheriff's office and provide full details of their intended destination.
• Regular check-ins with law enforcement. Registered sex offenders must comply with periodic check-ins and updates with local law enforcement. This includes updating any changes in residence, employment, or other significant life changes, which can be an ongoing burden.
• Social stigma and isolation. The societal stigma attached to being a registered sex offender can lead to social isolation, mental health issues, and significant emotional distress. Building or maintaining personal relationships can become exceedingly difficult.

What Is Considered Child Pornography?

Florida Statute 827.071(5) defines the offense of knowingly possessing, controlling, or viewing any media that depicts sexual conduct by a child. This is considered a third-degree felony. 

Note that each item of child pornography found (each magazine, photo, and so on) counts as its own separate sex crime offense. While possession alone is very serious, participation in the production or distribution of child pornography is considered an even more severe offense.

Production and distribution of child pornography include:

• Employing or permitting a minor for a sexual performance – 827.071(2)
• Promoting the sexual performance of a child – 827.071(3)
• Possessing media depicting the sexual performance of a child with intent to promote – 827.071(4)

In our digital age, it is now common for the “transmission” or sending of child pornography to happen over the Internet. This can constitute a federal offense, which is subject to its own set of statutes and penalties. For more information on your charges, what penalties you could be facing, and how our firm can help mount an effective and assertive defense in your favor, reach out to our Miami child pornography attorneys.

Admissibility of evidence in child pornography cases

The admissibility of evidence in child pornography cases can significantly impact
the outcome of a trial. Courts in Florida follow strict legal standards to determine
which evidence can be presented before a jury. This process is governed by both statutory
laws and case law precedents. Below are some of the factors our Miami child pornography lawyers at Beckham Law Firm can assess when evaluating the potential admissibility of evidence in your case.

• Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. In child pornography cases, the prosecution often relies on evidence obtained from electronic devices such as computers, smartphones, and tablets. For such evidence to be admissible, law enforcement must typically obtain a valid search warrant based on probable cause. The warrant must be specific, detailing the place to be searched and the items to be seized. Any evidence obtained through an unlawful search and seizure may be subject to suppression under the exclusionary rule, which means it cannot be used in court.
• Complications of digital evidence. Digital evidence frequently plays a central role in child pornography cases, and its admissibility is subject to rigorous scrutiny. Law enforcement agencies must ensure that the collection, preservation, and analysis of digital evidence comply with established forensic standards. For example, a proper chain of custody must be maintained to demonstrate that the evidence has not been tampered with or altered. Additionally, the methods used to extract and analyze digital data must be scientifically sound and reliable, often necessitating expert testimony to explain technical processes to the jury.
• Hearsay evidence and testimony. Hearsay evidence, which is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, is generally inadmissible. However, there are exceptions to this rule that can apply in child pornography cases. For example, statements made by children or victims might be admissible under certain conditions, such as if they fall under the "excited utterance" or "present sense impression" exceptions. Witness testimony, particularly that of law enforcement officers and digital forensic experts, also plays a crucial role and must meet the credibility and reliability standards set forth by the court.
• Relevance and prejudice. For evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant to the case, meaning it has a tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. However, even relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. In child pornography cases, the graphic nature of the material can be highly prejudicial. Courts must carefully weigh the necessity of presenting such evidence against the potential for undue prejudice.