2011 Cases

FACTS:

At 3:33 AM, Police observed the Defendant driving nearly 80 miles per hour on Bird Road. The Police detected signs of impairment once they made contact with the Defendant, and began a DUI investigation. The Defendant performed above standards on several of the roadside exercises, yet refused to blow into the breath machine. The Defendant admitted to drinking a few margaritas earlier that night. Defendant arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 11:40 PM, Police stopped the Defendant for having illegally tinted windows. As Police approached the drivers side window, they noticed the smell of an alcoholic beverage emitting from the car. The Defendant immediately stated “I refuse all exams”. As this point, the Officer decided to arrest the Defendant for DUI, based on his observations and her unwillingness to cooperate. The Defendant refused the breathalyzer.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:40 AM, the Defendant crashed into a crosswalk pole and sign, dragging both under his vehicle for over 2000 feet. The Defendant made no attempt to stop his car, as other drivers began to follow him. These drivers called the Police, and as Police arrived, they conducted a line-up in order to identify the driver. As Police arrested the Defendant for a Hit and Run DUI, the Defendant admitted to drinking a bottle of Santa Margherita Pinot Grigio earlier that night. Defendant blew a .161 and .154, double the legal limit. This was the Defendant’s second DUI arrest

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 5:25 AM, Police observed the Defendant seated in his car, unconscious. The car was running at this time, and also lodged against a barrier the Defendant had struck. As Police escorted the Defendant out of the vehicle, the Defendant could not stand nor perform the roadside exercises. Police arrested the Defendant for DUI, and then transported him to the station, where he blew a .271 and .269 into the breath machine, more than 3 times the legal limit.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 11:27 PM, Police received a call reference a person passed out asleep behind the wheel of a running car on the side of Kendall drive. Police arrived on the scene, and noticed the Defendant sleeping behind the wheel of the car, and a female passenger also asleep in the running vehicle. Police knocked on the window and made contact with the Defendant, who then tried to put the car in drive and leave. The Defendant was eventually arrested for DUI, and blew .133 and .141 into the breath machine.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 6:00 AM, Police arrived to an accident scene. Earlier that morning, while driving on I-95, the Defendant crashed into another vehicle and kept driving. Both vehicles came to rest on an exit ramp, and waited for Police. As Police arrived, they noticed the Defendant seemed impaired by alcohol. The Defendant performed roadside exercises on the highway, and later blew .151 and .153 into the breath machine. The Defendant was arrested for DUI with an accident.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:25 AM on New Years Eve, Police observed the Defendant make an illegal U-turn, and then pulled him over. The Defendant seemed nervous and intoxicated. The Defendant did not perform to standards on the roadside exercises, and was in possession of several different illegal narcotics. The Defendant later blew into the breath machine, however the machine did not register correct samples. The Police accused the Defendant of purposefully manipulating the breath machine, and arrested him for several felonies and DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI and DISMISSED all other charges.

FACTS:

At 6:00 PM, Police arrived on the scene of a traffic crash on the 826 and 57th Avenue. When Police arrived, the Defendant was outside the vehicle, already performing roadside exercises with another Trooper. As the Defendant did not perform to standards, Police arrested her for DUI with property damage. The Defendant stated she was driving because her boyfriend was too drunk to drive. The Defendant refused all statements and the breath machine. This was the Defendant’s 2nd DUI arrest.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 9:40 PM, Police arrived to a residential neighborhood as a result of a reported accident. Upon arrival, Police noticed the Defendant had run thru a stop sign and into 3 parked vehicles adjacent to her house. Police contacted the Defendant, who then performed the roadside exercises. The Defendant was crying and had slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. Police arrested the Defendant for DUI with property damage. The Defendant blew .164 and .164 into the breath machine.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:39 AM, Police responded to a restaurant where a hit and run took place. Upon receiving information as to who allegedly committed the crime, Police went to the home of the Defendant outside their jurisdiction, and knocked at her door. Upon the Defendant answering the door, Police arrested her for Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and then proceeded to commence a DUI investigation. The Defendant blew .133 and .133 into the breath machine, and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 4:02 PM, Police observed a car speed past and collide with a construction truck. Officers conducted an accident investigation, and then began a DUI investigation. Officer performed only 2 roadside exercises with the Defendant, and the Defendant exhibited unequal tracking before the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus exercise. The Defendant performed well on the walk and turn exercise, yet was arrested by Police. The Defendant refused the breathalyzer.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 11:25 PM, Police noticed a car swerving all over the road near the Turnpike and Bird Road. Police attempted to stop the Defendant, who kept driving until Police pulled along side her car and signaled her to stop. As Police contacted the Defendant she exhibited slurred speech. She refused to participate in any of the roadside exercises. Police later discovered partially drank bottles of Bacardi Limon in the Defendant’s glove box. This was the Defendant’s 3rd DUI arrest, and 2nd subsequent refusal to blow into the breath machine.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:35 AM, Police responded to the scene of a traffic crash involving the Defendant and a yellow taxi cab. As Police approached the Defendant, he admitted to having a few beers earlier that night. The Defendant was at fault in the accident, and did not perform well on the roadside exercises. The Defendant later blew into the breath machine below the legal limit, .079 and .068. The Police then requested the Defendant provide a urine sample, as they believe the Defendant to be under the influence of a controlled substance. The Defendant refused to provide a urine sample and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 12:10 AM, Police responded to the scene of a hit and run accident. Police detained the Defendant, who exhibited signs of alcohol impairment. The Defendant performed above standards on the walk and turn exercise, yet failed the HGN and one leg stand. The Defendant did not make any statements, yet later blew .170 and .180 into the breathalyzer machine, over twice the legal limit. The breath machine was not properly calibrated when the Defendant provided the samples.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:05 AM, Police observed the Defendant swerve outside his lane on 88th Street and 107th Avenue. The DUI Task Force responded to the scene and performed roadside exercises with the Defendant. The Defendant did not perform to standards on the exercises, and was arrested for DUI. The Defendant blew into the breath machine 4 different times, resulting in readings of .049, .042, .059, and .062.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 8:00 AM, Police responded to an accident scene and saw the Defendant seated behind the wheel of his vehicle. The Defendant had swerved off the road and ran into a wooden fence. After Police conducted a traffic crash investigation, they began a DUI investigation, as the Defendant admitted to drinking two beers earlier that night. The Defendant did not perform up to standards on the roadside exercises, and refused to blow into the breath machine.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

The Defendant initially hired another attorney in an attempt to resolve his DUI case. The other attorney was unable to resolve the case after one year of litigation and told the Defendant he had to “plea guilty” to DUI. The Defendant was active armed forces and could not plea guilty to a DUI. The Defendant hired our firm, and within 24 hours we resolved the case.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

Police arrested the Defendant twice within one year for DUI. These arrests were the Defendant’s 2nd and 3rd DUI arrests in his life. During the first DUI arrest, the Defendant was driving the wrong way down 8th Street. When Police stopped him, he failed the roadside exercises, and refused to blow into the breathalyzer machine. During the second DUI arrest, the Defendant drove thru an accident scene and almost hit several Police Officers. The Defendant again failed the roadside exercises and refused the breathalyzer.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED both DUI charges.

FACTS:

At 3:10 AM, Police observed the Defendant swerve in and out of her lane 11 times within a 3 block period, almost colliding with several vehicles. When Police stopped the Defendant and asked her for her drivers license, she gave Officers her credit card. The Defendant could barely stand up outside her vehicle and did not perform the exercises to standard. She later blew .207 and .211 into the breathalyzer machine. This was the Defendant’s 3rd DUI arrest, and her 2nd DUI within 5 years.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 5:55 AM, Miami Beach Police responded to a parking garage on 7th Street in reference to a person who backed out of a parking space and into another vehicle. Police made contact with the Defendant, who exhibited signs of impairment. The Defendant then showed Police a fake-ID. The Police arrested the Defendant for several charges including DUI, and the Defendant refused to blow into the breathalyzer stating “everybody told me not to”.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI and all other charges.

FACTS:

At 6:00 AM, Police were driving behind the Defendant, who swerved erratically in and out of his lane. Upon making contact with the Defendant, Police noticed he was very nervous and scared. The Defendant performed roadside exercises on the side of the Macarthur Causeway, and did not perform to standards. The Defendant admitted to having a few beers earlier that night, and refused the breathalyzer as the machine “timed out” before he could make a decision.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 11:30 PM, Police observed the Defendant driving the wrong way on a one-way street. Police pulled over the Defendant, who admitted to drinking three 12 ounce Heinekens earlier that night. The Defendant stated he twisted his ankle and therefore could not perform the roadside exercises that night. The Defendant exhibited a blank, “1000 yard stare”. Police arrested the Defendant for DUI. The Defendant later refused to blow into the breath machine.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 12:00 AM, the Defendant ran her car into the car of an off-duty Police Officer on I-95. The Defendant kept going, and did not stop. The Officer radioed other Officers, who eventually caught up to the Defendant. After the accident, the Defendant spontaneously stated she drank vodka earlier that night. The Defendant did not perform to standards on the roadside exercises and refused to blow into the breath machine. The Defendant was charged with DUI with property damage and leaving the scene of an accident.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

Around 3:45 AM, Police received an anonymous tip regarding a person driving “all over the road”. Police then pulled onto the highway and noticed a car matching this same description. Police stopped the Defendant who admitted to drinking earlier that night at the Improv nightclub. The Defendant then told Police she was not going to cooperate any further with their investigation. Police found marijuana in the Defendant’s car, and charged her with DUI. The Defendant refused the breathalyzer.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI and all other charges.

FACTS:

At 3:30 AM, the Defendant swerved 8 times out of his lane and performed an illegal U turn. Police stopped the Defendant and began a DUI investigation. The Defendant’s attitude was insulting and uncooperative. The Defendant spewed profanities at the Police. The Defendant did not perform well on the roadside exercises, and refused to sign any documents. The Defendant also refused the breath machine. Police charged him with DUI and resisting arrest without violence.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI and all other charges.

FACTS:

Federal Agents stopped the Defendant in his car while driving on a Federal Preserve in South Miami. Upon approaching the Defendant, Agents noticed the smell of an alcoholic beverage coming from the Defendant. The Defendant admitted to drinking earlier that day, and then performed roadside exercises. The Defendant later blew over the limit into the breath machine, and was arrested on Federal land for a DUI.

RESULTS:

The Federal Government DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:15 AM, Police pulled over the Defendant, who was dressed as a pirate. The Defendant admitted to drinking several beers earlier that night, as she performed the roadside exercises. The Defendant also had an open 12 pack of Miller Lite in her car, and four different prescription medication in her possession. The Defendant was unable to blow into the breath machine, yet her urine tested positive for 5 different controlled substances, including Cocaine. Defendant arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

While on Miami Beach, the Defendant ran her scooter into another car. When Police arrived on the scene, they noticed a water bottle filled with an alcoholic beverage in the Defendant’s possession. The Defendant also appeared to be extremely intoxicated. Fire Rescue treated the Defendant, and took her blood. Police decided to let the Defendant go home after giving her a ticket for no valid driver’s license, pending the results of the blood draw.

RESULTS:

The Firm PREVENTED the State from filing the DUI charge.

FACTS:

Around 12:40 AM, Police were dispatched to the scene of an accident. Upon making contact with the Defendant, Police noticed signs of impairment. The Defendant could barely stand up, using her car for support. She continually dropped her driver’s license on the roadway, and could not understand what was happening. The Defendant failed the roadside exercises, and later blew .160 and .145 into the breath machine, nearly two times the legal limit, and admitted to taking Oxycontin earlier that night.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:31 AM, Police arrived on the scene of an accident. The Defendant had run into a traffic pole, and then into a building, causing thousands of dollars in damage. Fire Rescue treated the Defendant, who appeared disoriented and intoxicated. Police transported the Defendant to the hospital. The Defendant did not perform roadside exercises, nor did he submit to a breathalyzer. The Defendant’s blood alcohol level at the hospital was a .287, three times over the legal limit.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

Around 2:45 AM, the DUI Task Force stopped the Defendant for following too closely and failure to maintain a single lane. Police noticed signs of impairment when speaking with the Defendant. The Defendant cooperated fully, providing breath and urine samples. The Defendant blew .067 and .057 into the breath machine, below the legal limit. However the Defendant tested positive for two controlled substances in his urine, after a full drug recognition evaluation. Defendant arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

Around 12:04 AM, Police observed the Defendant driving his car, failing to maintain his lane. Police stopped the Defendant, who exhibited slurred speech and the smell of alcoholic beverage. The Defendant admitted to having a suspended license, and could not maintain his balance. He appeared sleepy and could not understand what the Police Officer was saying. The Defendant failed the roadside exercises, yet blew under the legal limit, .067.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

AT 10:12 PM, Police arrived on the scene of a traffic crash. The Defendant was at fault for the crash, and after completing the accident investigation, Police turned to the DUI investigation. The Defendant told Police he had a leg injury, yet decided to perform the roadside exercises. Police did not conduct the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus exercise. Police arrested the Defendant on suspicion of DUI. Defendant refused to blow into the breathalyzer.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 12:25 AM, Police stopped the Defendant for running a stop sign and speeding. Police then noticed several signs of impairment, included the smell of an alcoholic beverage. The Defendant had a cocky and insulting attitude with Police. The Defendant refused to cooperate, and did not perform the roadside exercises or blow into the breath machine. The Defendant did, however, offer sexual favors and attempted to engage in a “threesome” with various members of the Police.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:24 AM, Troopers arrived on the scene of a crash. Upon making contact with the Defendant, the Trooper initiated a DUI investigation. The Defendant admitted to drinking an entire bottle of wine earlier that night. The Defendant failed the roadside exercises, however the Officer did not fill out the paperwork correctly. The Defendant later refused to blow into the breath machine, and was arrested for DUI with property damage.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 10:00 PM, Police stopped the Defendant for making an illegal U-turn. Upon contacting the Defendant, Police began a DUI investigation. The Defendant admitted to drinking one or two drinks that night, and performed the roadside exercises. Based on his performance, Police arrested the Defendant. The Defendant later refused to blow into the breath machine. This was the Defendant’s 2nd DUI within 5 years. The State re-filed the case after a first dismissal.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI after the re-file.

FACTS:

Around midnight, Police responded to the scene of a two vehicle crash. After the initial traffic crash investigation, the DUI task force arrived on the scene. The Officers conducted a DUI investigation with the Defendant, during which the Defendant failed all 5 roadside exercises. The Defendant later blew .177 and .180 into the breath machine, over twice the legal limit. The State charged the Defendant with DUI with bodily injury and an accident.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI and all other charges.

FACTS:

Around 3:00 AM on Miami Beach, Police followed the Defendant for nearly one mile while she committed a host of traffic infractions, including speeding, following too closely, and reckless driving. Police stopped the Defendant, who had slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. The Police performed a full DRE (drug recognition evaluation) on the Defendant, requesting breath and urine. Both results came back negative, however the Defendant had already been arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

Around 4:30 AM, Police stopped the Defendant for a traffic infraction. Police noticed signs of impairment, and began a DUI investigation. The Police Officer immediately offered the Defendant a breath test, as the Defendant was under the legal drinking age of 21. The Defendant refused to provide a sample. The Officer never offered the individual roadside exercises.

RESULTS:

The Firm PREVENTED the State from filing the DUI charge.

FACTS:

Around 9:00 PM, Police stopped the Defendant for swerving between two lanes. Upon making contact with the Defendant, Police noticed slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. The Defendant was visibly intoxicated and rude to the Police, and she could not understand why Police puller her over. She miserably failed all roadside exercises, and complained she only had 2 drinks. She later blew .223 and .223 into the breathalyzer machine, nearly 3 times the legal limit.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:27 AM, Police issued a BOLO (be on the lookout) for a car driving recklessly on the roadway. Upon catching up to the car and stopping the vehicle, Police made contact with the Defendant, who inserted a Listerine Cool Breath strip into his mouth immediately. The Defendant told Police he was at Bongos nightclub and had a couple drinks earlier that night. Police arrested the Defendant for DUI and took him to the Police Station. The Defendant blew under the legal limit, .067 and .065.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 6:07 AM, Police responded to the accident scene. Defendant rear ended another vehicle while driving carelessly. Defendant willingly stated “I have only had four vodka and cranberry drinks so I’m OK, you can check me.” Defendant acknowledged to be driving with his license suspended. Defendant failed the roadsides and blew a .198 and .197. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI and DISMISSED all charges.

FACTS:

At 1:45 PM, Police observed Defendant peel out of a local sports bar parking lot and fishtail out of control. Police followed Defendant with emergency lights and sirens activated for several blocks until Defendant pulled over. Defendant’s speech was not understandable. Police instructed Defendant to perform roadsides. Defendant failed and refused to provide a breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 7:25 PM, Defendant drove through several shrubs, crashed into a tree, a stop sign in the parking lot and a second stop sign. Police arrived and approached Defendant. Defendant nearly fell backwards but agreed to perform the roadsides. Defendant began the test before he was instructed to do so, put his foot down several times during the balance test, and rushed through the walk-and-turn failing to touch heel to toe. Defendant blew .203 and .211 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED all charges.

FACTS:

At 2:50 AM, Defendant was stopped at a DUI check point. When asked to exit the vehicle, Defendant struggled, held the door handle, and claimed to be nervous. Defendant eventually agreed to perform the roadsides. In the walk-and-turn exercise, Defendant only took 4 steps in each direction instead of the requested nine. Defendant used arms to balance in the one-leg stand exercise and still put her foot down several times throughout the exercise. Defendant provided a breath sample of .217 and .217, more the twice the legal limit, and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:39 AM, Police officer was driving behind Defendant when he switched over to the left-turning lane. As the police officer was about to pass Defendant, Defendant cut officer off, nearly striking his vehicle. Police immediately pulled Defendant over and requested he perform the roadsides. Defendant swayed uncontrollably and failed all exercises. Defendant admitted to having a few beers a few hours prior and blew .127, .105, and .125 on three breath samples. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 4:15 AM, Police observed Defendant driving off of the road and past the solid white line on the right most lane of travel. Defendant was driving about 20 mph under the speed limit, and cut in front of the driver in the center lane, causing him to slam on his brakes repeatedly to avoid a collision. Police stopped Defendant and requested that the roadsides be performed. When asked what time it was, Defendant responded 3am, when it was in fact 5 minutes till 5am, and said she felt “buzzed.” Defendant’s breathalyzer readings were .171 and .168. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:52, Police stopped Defendant for running a flashing red light. Police observed Defendant’s license was suspended for a previous DUI and had a “C” restriction, business purposes only. Defendant said she was on the way to a girlfriend’s house. Defendant failed the Horizontal Gaze test and the one leg stand exercise. Defendant refused to submit to a breathalyzer test and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:14 AM, Police observed Defendant going 65 mph in a 40 mph zone and swerving in and out of the driving lane. Police pulled Defendant over. Defendant could barely be understood in either English or Spanish. However, Defendant was able to clearly state, “I’m not as drunk as the others.” When asked to perform the roadsides, Defendant said he was “only a little drunk.” Defendant blew .150 and .155 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:42 AM, Police pulled Defendant over for violation of the Florida Move Over Law. While conversing with the Police Officer, Defendant was unable to keep his balance. Defendant missed the tip of his nose several times during the finger-to-nose test and was asked not to finish the one leg stand test for his own safety as he was swaying from side to side and put his foot down several times. Defendant did not perform to standards in the roadsides and blew a .147 and .141. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 4:17 AM, Defendant was travelling at approximately 80 MPH in a clearly marked 35 MPH zone, and proceeded to pass the clearly marked Police vehicle. Police attempted to catch up to him and had to reach speeds of 90 MPH until he stopped at a red light and Police pulled Defendant over. Police officer noticed a strong odor of both marijuana and alcohol emitting from the Defendant and asked him to perform the roadside tests, three of which he failed. Defendant blew .143 and .139 on his breathalyzer test and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 6:59 AM, Police blocked off the road to conduct an investigation on a traffic crash involving a fatality when Defendant drove through the road block. Police pulled Defendant over and asked for his Driver’s License and if he did not see the cones, caution tape and flashing lights. The Defendant responded “No” and did not have his identification. Defendant made several statements implying that he only had a couple of drinks at Tootsies. Defendant did not finish all the roadsides because his “ankles were sore,” refused to provide a breath sample, and Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 4:37 PM, Police observed Defendant making a left turn without yielding to traffic and nearly causing a collision. Police pulled the Defendant over and requested he perform the roadsides which he agreed to. During the Walk and Turn exercise Defendant nearly fell on the floor and the exercise was stopped for the safety of the Defendant. The defendant blew .348 and .355, more than four times the legal limit. Fire Rescue examined the Defendant and took his vitals due to the excessive intoxication and cleared him for transport to the arresting agency. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 5:21 AM, Police was stopped at a red light next to Defendant. Police observed Defendant was not wearing his seat belt. Although Defendant was in a right turn only lane, the Defendant proceeded to travel straight when the light turned green and was then pulled over by the police officer. Defendant was extremely excited and talkative, “wildly” chewing gum, and did not complete the one leg stand exercise because he was falling over. The Defendant spontaneously stated “I’m not drunk but I did do half a roll” and refused to provide a breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:34 AM, Police observed Defendant traveling at 56 MPH in a clearly marked 35 MPH zone. When asked to perform the roadsides, Defendant nearly fell twice in the Walk and Turn exercise. The Defendant also put his foot down two, ten, then three times on his multiple attempts to complete the one leg stand test. In the finger to nose test, Defendant opened his eyes various times despite instructions given and refused to provide a breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:24 AM, Defendant collided with another vehicle due to failure to control vehicle. Defendant also drove onto the sidewalk and crashed into a light pole causing it to fall and hit a parked car at a local residence. After Fire Rescue cleared Defendant, Police informed him they would conduct a DUI investigation and he responded, “Please don’t do this… I will get fired!.. I only went to the store to buy more beer.” After failing two exercises, Defendant said, “Guys, if you want, just take me” and refused any further exercises and breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:20 AM, Police responded to a reported crash where Defendant had crashed into a palm tree on the median. Police and Fire Rescue examined Defendant and when Defendant was medically cleared the officers asked for her driver’s license and registration. Defendant randomly stated “I don’t understand what is going on here.” When Police asked, Defendant agreed to allow Fire Rescue to take a sample of her blood but quickly changed her mind and refused, also refusing to be transported to the Hospital and to provide a breath sample. Defendant was vomiting, crying, talkative, and her clothes were soiled. Defendant was unable to perform the roadsides and continued to ask “what is happening.” Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 11:58 PM, Police heard Defendant’s radio blasting from over 25 feet away. Police pulled Defendant over and Defendant openly admitted to having consumed a few alcoholic beverages that night. Defendant was asked to perform the roadsides and did not perform to standards, losing count when doing the Walk and Turn exercise and not touching heal to toe. Defendant provided a breath sample of .180 and .174, more than twice the legal limit, and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 7:50 PM, Police responded to an accident where the Defendant backed into a parked vehicle. The Defendant spontaneously stammered “I have been drinking” and said he had four cups of whiskey before he attempted to get in his vehicle and drive home. The defendant blew a .205 and .212 in his breathalyzer results and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 12:57 AM, Police responded to a call regarding the Defendant’s reckless driving. Defendant failed to yield right-of-way to oncoming traffic while making a left hand turn, and was traveling 44 MPH on a clearly marked 30 MPH zone. First, the defendant said she had nothing to drink that night, but soon explained she had had “two glasses of wine, maybe three.” In the Walk and Turn exercise defendant counted 9 steps but only took 5, stepping off the line twice. When asked for a breath sample, Defendant explained “All my friends that are Attorneys said you should never do it… I also take prescriptive meds and don’t know how that would affect the results…. I’ve seen Papi drive drunker than I drove today. This isn’t fair.”

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 1:37 AM Police observed Defendant turn right, onto the sidewalk, and crash into a crosswalk pole and sign. Defendant proceeded to drag the sign under his vehicle over 2000 feet without any attempt to stop or report the incident. Defendant could not stand on his own to perform the roadsides and the exercises attempted were stopped for his safety. Defendant was wearing a bloody Mickey Mouse shirt and had no shoes on. Defendant blew .168 and .151 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:09 AM, Police observed Defendant make a sharp right turn and nearly lose control of the vehicle and conducted a traffic stop. Police asked Defendant what happened that made her crash into the pole, and Defendant responded that she thought it would be funny to do it and get pulled over right in front of her house, and she further explained that she was playing around. Defendant laughed throughout the roadsides and playfully asked “Who? What? You’re going to arrest me for this?” Defendant blew .103 and .092 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:30 AM Police observed Defendant run a solid red light and continue to drive, swerving from lane to lane. Police asked Defendant to step out of the vehicle. Defendant stumbled and had trouble maintaining balance. Police called for backup and assisting officers asked Defendant to perform roadsides. Defendant did not perform to standards and refused to provide a breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI. While in the Police car, Defendant continuously ram head onto divisor cage.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 10:41 PM, Defendant backed into another vehicle. Police arrived at the scene and noticed Defendant was unsteady. Defendant was asked to perform the roadsides to which he was give instruction numerous times before commencing exercises. Defendant requested a repetition of instructions and still did not perform to standards. Defendant blew .141 and .142 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 6:00 AM, Police responded to a scene of an accident involving injuries. Defendant crashed into another vehicle and was cleared by the Fire Rescue Department. Defendant openly admitted to having consumed 4 glasses of rum and coke prior to operating the vehicle. Defendant refused to submit a breath sample and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DISMISSED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 8:30 PM, Police observed Defendant tailgating the car in front of him, traveling at 62 MPH in a clearly posted 40 MPH zone, and swerving from side-to-side. Police stopped Defendant and asked for documentation. Defendant was disoriented and confused. Police noticed four underage children as passengers in the vehicle. Police requested Defendant perform roadsides. Defendant spontaneously stated he had a couple of glasses of wine. Defendant refused to provide a breath sample and fell asleep while Police filled out paperwork. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 3:54 AM, Police observed Defendant stopped at a green light. Defendant suddenly began to drive with the flow of traffic and then failed to maintain the vehicle in a single lane, swerving in and out of lanes. Defendant began following the Police car very closely and slammed on her brakes. Defendant abruptly hit the accelerator, screeching the tires and nearly rear ending the Police car. Police approached Defendant who was moving very slowly and said they had to get home fast because of work the next morning. Defendant explained she was not drunk and just really wanted to get home. Defendant was unable to stand on her own and could not perform the roadsides to standard. Defendant blew .144 and .138 and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 8:40 PM, Police observed Defendant make an illegal left turn and stopped Defendant. Defendant was nervous and sweating and smelled of marijuana. Defendant openly admitted to having smoked marijuana earlier and claimed to have some in his mouth in attempts to destroy the evidence. Defendant blew .00 on both breath samples and provided a urine sample, which indicated Defendant was under the influence of Cannabis. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 2:40 AM, Police observed Defendant travelling at 8 mph in a marked 50 mph zone. When approached, Defendant stopped in her lane of travel and did not pull over away from traffic until the Police asked three times. Defendant handed Police the passenger’s license instead of her own and then snatched it back. Defendant provided her registration but never her insurance. Police reminded Defendant of insurance card and Defendant said “that’s it right there, right?” referring to the registration card. Defendant agreed to perform the roadsides but swayed and struggled to maintain balance. Defendant refused to provide a breath sample stating that students in law school are taught to never provide a breath sample. Defendant was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.

FACTS:

At 5:28 AM, Police observed Defendant sitting in vehicle with motor running. Police approached Defendant and smelled alcohol in his breath. Police asked Defendant to perform roadsides but Defendant was unable to stand on his own. Defendant could not follow and assimilate instructions. Defendant refused three of the five tests and failed to perform to standard on the two he executed. Defendant also refused to provide a breath sample and was arrested for DUI.

RESULTS:

The State DROPPED the DUI.